I believe trading is far more an art than a science. For one thing, if trading were a science, then we should all be able to enter the same trade at the same time, and exit at the same time getting identical results. We all know that just isn’t so. Yet if trading were scientific, we should be able to get identical results doing the same thing. I believe such expectation describes the "scientific method."
In addition, if trading were scientific, we should be able to come up with a “get rich” formula that would work all the time. We could then all retire and never have to work again. We all now this isn’t so either.
When we as traders make a trading decision, most of the time we never fully know why we are making that decision.
You look at a market, you think about taking a trade in that market, and at some point you pull the trigger. You have thought of dozens of things in the time interval leading up to your entry. If I were to ask you, "Why are you exactly why you are buying or why you are selling, you will probably not be able to give an accurate answer. You may be able to give a few reasons, but it will most likely not be the full answer. A lot of your decision to enter is subconscious. You do not really know why you entered, especially if you are daytrading. To that extent it is more an art than a science, because you cannot fully demonstrate why you are doing what you are doing.
But you could say, "I fully know what I'm doing. I am taking the trade because I am following the signals of my method or system." Wonderful, you have just proved my point. When you are blindly trading signals from a method or system, you truly don't know why you are taking the trade. You are essentially acting like a robot, pre-programmed to follow signals whether or not they make sense.
I am not disparaging trading that way. If a method or system produces winning results, then what you are doing is following a statistically proven plan. All methods and all systems are based on statistics. The odds on any single trade are never more than 50% win or lose. However, the probability for a succession of trades is quite another story. If you are trading a method that wins seven out of ten times that you enter, and the method has produced a loser three or four times in a row, then the probability for a successful trade increases each time you enter the market. Sooner or later, over a series of trades, you are going to have the result of seven winners against 3 losers. That is statistically valid; however, it is not exactly rocket science. You will have proven that trading is an art -- the art of following a statistically valid plan.
Sign up for our FREE weekly Chart Scan newsletter.
Master Trader Joe Ross wants you to learn trading and he created products to do just that, teach you how to trade. Click here to find which ones best fit your trading style. Learn the art of trading Joe Ross' way!